Annex D - Email communication analysis
|
Property type |
Overall sentiment |
Main concerns raised |
Typical questions / requests |
Key risks identified |
|
Terraced – no front storage space |
Predominantly negative |
• No storage space for 2
additional bins |
• Can boxes be
retained? |
• Fire hazard in alleys |
|
Terraced – with forecourt or front garden |
Mostly negative to mixed |
• Limited space despite
forecourt |
• Option for smaller
bins? |
• Obstruction on collection
days |
|
Semi‑detached houses |
Mixed |
• Bins too large for low
recyclers |
• Choice of bin size? |
• Under‑used
capacity |
|
Detached houses |
Generally neutral to supportive |
• Capacity vs frequency
confusion |
• Could larger bins be
offered for large households? |
• Lower risk overall |
|
Assisted collection households |
Cautious to negative |
• Difficulty manoeuvring
bins |
• Will assisted collections
remain unchanged? |
• Reduced independence |
|
Across all property types |
Widespread concern |
• Lack of free‑text
comment boxes |
• Why no open comments in
survey? |
• Loss of trust in
consultation |
Table 11 – Analysis of email communication by household type.