Annex D - Email communication analysis

 

Property type

Overall sentiment

Main concerns raised

Typical questions / requests

Key risks identified

Terraced – no front storage space

Predominantly negative

• No storage space for 2 additional bins
• Bins left permanently in alleys
• Fire risk and arson concerns
• Obstruction of escape routes and pavements
• Visual clutter

• Can boxes be retained?
• Can smaller bins be offered?
• Are communal or shared hubs possible?
• How will fire risks be managed?

• Fire hazard in alleys
• Enforcement challenges
• Reduced participation in recycling
• Increased street clutter

Terraced – with forecourt or front garden

Mostly negative to mixed

• Limited space despite forecourt
• Difficulty moving multiple bins
• Noise (glass)
• Hygiene and contamination

• Option for smaller bins?
• Can boxes remain alongside bins?
• Help for older residents?

• Obstruction on collection days
• Increased contamination
• Accessibility issues

Semi‑detached houses

Mixed

• Bins too large for low recyclers
• Storage space still limited for some
• Bins blocking driveways/pavements

• Choice of bin size?
• Can low‑waste households opt out?
• What happens if a collection is missed?

• Under‑used capacity
• Resident dissatisfaction rather than operational failure

Detached houses

Generally neutral to supportive

• Capacity vs frequency confusion
• Aesthetics of large bins
• Missed collections

• Could larger bins be offered for large households?
• Why not food waste?

• Lower risk overall
• Risk mainly reputational if concerns ignored

Assisted collection households

Cautious to negative

• Difficulty manoeuvring bins
• Fear of changed collection points
• Do not generate enough recycling to justify bins

• Will assisted collections remain unchanged?
• Can smaller containers be used?

• Reduced independence
• Increased service complaints

Across all property types

Widespread concern

• Lack of free‑text comment boxes
• Perception of a predetermined decision
• Confusion over legislation vs council choice
• Cost and value for money

• Why no open comments in survey?
• What evidence supports bins over boxes?
• Can education be prioritised over container changes?

• Loss of trust in consultation
• Reduced public buy‑in

 

Table 11 – Analysis of email communication by household type.